During the Gymnastics and the Olympic Jump, spectators learned that judges do not use slow motion cameras to review athletes when they compete. Things that move in fast motion or subtle errors that cannot be seen in real time, therefore those points cannot be removed from your scores. Still, those mistakes are real, they did occur and should be counted, but they are not. Why? Simple, because that is how it has always been done in the Olympic Games and, nevertheless, these excuses seem absurd nowadays and; “We are doing it this way, because it has always been done that way!” It sounds like a sorry excuse for those who fear change by supporting the status quo.
What should we do? Well, first it would be fairer to get rid of the judges all together and use a slow motion optical recognition system to judge, the scores will appear faster and you will remove the human element, the human element of misleading judges for example. . Or what about the curse of the first athlete in competition, judges are known to be more relaxed in scoring as time goes on in the match, giving the lucky diver or gymnast who is last or penultimate in the match an advantage. competence. .
You see, the Olympics are all about justice: no cheating, no doping, no interference from other athletes, and in the spirit of that fairness motive, let’s fix an obvious problem and save the Olympic Committee from embarrassment next time. catch someone cheating. be it coach, athlete or judge.
Well, now that you are with me in this, this is what I propose. Have 100 judges watch slow motion videos of divers and gymnasts and ask them to rate those videos and show where and why they got points from a perfect score, so they will train the artificial intelligent video optical recognition system for flawless evaluation.
Viewers at home who watch TV can watch the instant replays and see exactly what the computerized artificial intelligence software judge saw. There will be fewer disputes and a fairer game and the best athletes will win and there will be no more ambiguity in the judges. If I were a gymnast or diver at the Olympic level, I would applaud that system for making events fair and would rely on a system that allows the best man or woman to win. Consider all of this and think about it.